Showing posts with label The Explosive Child. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Explosive Child. Show all posts

Sunday, October 12, 2014

5 WAYS TO IMPROVE SCHOOL FOR BEHAVIORALLY CHALLENGING STUDENTS - Ross Greene

The original post can be found on the Simon and Schuster "Tips on Life and Love" blog. CLICK HERE! for original post.

5 WAYS TO IMPROVE SCHOOL FOR BEHAVIORALLY CHALLENGING STUDENTS

0 Comments 01 October 2014
DisruptiveKidsinClass400Teachers, parents, and students enter each school year with anticipation and trepidation, perhaps especially so when a student has a history of behavioral challenges.Dealing with behaviorally challenging students and their parents has been identified as one of the greatest stressors for teachers, and student behavior problems are commonly cited as a leading factor causing teachers to leave the profession prematurely. In the U.S. and Canada, rates of officediscipline referrals, detentions, suspensions, and (in 19 American states) corporal punishment, remain at astronomical levels.
Understanding and helping behaviorally challenging students is hard, and traditional school disciplinary practices frequently aren’t up to the task. Effective intervention often requires new lenses and new practices. I’ve gone into great details about the foregoing guidance in my book, Lost at School, but here are some key points that should help.
Stop Blaming
While this has become a bit of a cliché, it’s still very common for parents and educators to blame each other for a child’s behavioral challenges at school (and, of course, both sets of adults frequently blame the child). School personnel often point toward less-than-ideal family circumstances as the cause of these challenges. It’s worth noting that the parents aren’t at school when their child exhibits challenging behavior. It’s also worth pointing out that many well behaved students come from family situations that are less than ideal. Parent bashing simply causes the folks at school to become distracted by factors they can do little about and to lose sight of the fact that a lot of good can be done in the six hours a day, five days a week, and nine months that a student is in school every year, irrespective of adverse circumstances at home. And parent bashing also makes it much harder to collaborate with parents, who are usually well aware of the fact that they’re being viewed as “the problem.”
Blaming is just as common in the opposite direction. Educators often feel that parents don’t appreciate how hard it is to handle the classroom disruptions of behaviorally challenging students, especially when classroom teachers are under enormous pressure to get every student over the increasingly high bar set by high-stakes testing (the standard by which teachers are judged). While many educators are invested in helping their behaviorally challenging students, they often haven’t received training on how to best accomplish the mission.
Focus on Lagging Skills Rather Than Lagging Motivation
Perhaps the most compelling finding from the research that has accumulated on behaviorally challenging kids over the past 40-50 years is that lagging skills (rather than lagging motivation) is the primary factor contributing to challenging behavior. That probably explains why characterizations such as “attention seeking,” “unmotivated,” “manipulative,” and “limit-testing” aren’t very accurate, and why all those sticker charts, time-outs, trips to the office, detentions, suspensions, and paddlings aren’t helping very much. It’s far more productive to identify the skills a child is lacking–skills such as flexibility/adaptability, frustration tolerance, and problem-solving–so as to come to a more accurate understanding of the true factors making it hard for a child to meet academic and behavioral expectations at school. In other words, behavioral challenges are a form of developmental delay, and are really quite similar to other forms of developmental delays (reading, writing, language, math) that are commonly seen in schools. Of course, identifying lagging skills also helps adults stop blaming the student for his behavioral challenges. If he could do well, he would do well.
Focus on Problems Rather Than Behaviors
It’s very tempting for adults to focus primarily on the behaviors a student exhibits—hitting, biting, screaming, swearing, belligerence, and so forth—when he’s having difficulty meeting expectations. But it’s usually far more productive to focus on the problems that are causing those behaviors (I call them unsolved problems): for example, difficulty getting along with a particular classmate at recess, difficulty standing in line for lunch, difficulty sitting next to a particular peer during circle time, difficulty on a particular academic task. The switch in focus helps shift the adult role from behavior modifier to problem-solver. It’s not uncommon for classroom teachers, counselors, and administrators to focus exclusively on a student’s behaviors for an entire school year and never solve any of the problems that are causing those behaviors. This is demoralizing for educators, parents, and students, and, over time, causes kids to become hopeless, alienated, and disenfranchised. I’ve developed a brief instrument to assist in identifying lagging skills and unsolved problems—it’s called theAssessment of Lagging Skills and Unsolved Problems and can be found both inLost at School and on the website of my non-profit organization, Lives in the Balance.
Solve Problems Collaboratively Rather Than Unilaterally
Even when adults are in problem-solving mode, they often come up with unilateral solutions that they then impose on a student. These solutions are usually based on no information or buy-in from the intended beneficiary of the solution: the student. While there’s no question that adults may have great insights about a student’s difficulties, and outstanding solutions to offer, it’s far better to view the student as a collaborative partner, one with extremely important information to provide about the problems that are causing challenging behavior, and with (often surprising) ideas about how those problems can be solved.
The same notions are equally applicable to problem solving between parents and teachers. Often teachers and administrators impose solutions and expect both students and their parents to abide by their decrees. Once again, better for the adults to come to a consensus on what’s truly getting in the way for the student (with significant input from the student himself) and then work together toward solutions. There are many benefits to solving problems this way, including the fact that both parents and educators have unique expertise to offer on the same child, and that there’s no one to blame when solutions don’t work as well as hoped (since those solutions were a team effort). By the way, solutions that aren’t working aren’t cause for returning to old, punitive, unilateral ways of dealing with behaviorally challenging kids; rather, it’s reason to return to the problem-solving table to come up with improved solutions after figuring out why the initial solution didn’t quite accomplish the mission.
Solve Problems Proactively Rather Than Emergently
A lot of intervention that takes place in schools occurs emergently and reactively, in the heat of the moment. But that’s very poor timing on solving problems, and helps explain why many problems remain unsolved. Fortunately, when schools routinely use the Assessment of Lagging Skills and Unsolved Problems, challenging episodes become highly predictable, and the stage is set for the collaboration on solving problems to be planned and proactive. Of course, many members of the school staff wonder when they’ll find the time to solve problems proactively with their students. While it’s true that, in many schools, time had to be carved out of already-busy schedules to solve problems with their most at-risk students, most of the concerns about time come before staff begins solving problems collaboratively and proactively with their students. Over time–after they’ve been doing it for a while–it’s common for staff to have concluded that solving problems collaboratively and proactively actually saves time.
Lost at School: Why Our Kids with Behavioral Challenges are Falling Through the Cracks and How We Can Help Them

LOST AT SCHOOL: WHY OUR KIDS WITH BEHAVIORAL CHALLENGES ARE FALLING THROUGH THE CRACKS AND HOW WE CAN HELP THEM

Ross W. Greene
Dr. Ross W. Greene is associate clinical professor in the Department of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and the author of both Lost at School andThe Explosive Child. He is also the founder of a non-profit organization called Lives in the Balance (LivesintheBalance.org), through which he disseminates the model of care described in his books, Collaborative Problem Solving. Dr. Greene’s research has been funded by the US Department of Education, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the Stanley Medical Research Institute, and the Maine Juvenile Justice Advisory Group. 

Saturday, June 4, 2011

A Moment of Plan B

A Moment of Plan B

Background: This girl, about 10 years old, had a meltdown the week prior when pulled out of a class at school for a therapy appointment. She usually enjoys being pulled and uses the therapy time well. She does have trouble with expressing herself when upset, usually loses her ability to communicate in words, shuts down with her head on her desk, and often tosses her notebook or tips her desk over, necessitating a room clear. That is what happened last week when her therapist came to pull her: her head hit the desk, the binder flew, the class left, and the principal was called. Below is something pretty close to a Plan B conversation with the student a few days later.

Empathy:

Therapist: You remember last week when I came to pull you? That seemed really hard, what was up?

Kid: I really like that class.

Therapist: You really like that class?

Kid: Yeah, we do cool stuff in there. I don't like to miss it.

Therapist: So the deal was you just didn't want to miss that class?

Kid: Yeah.

Therapist: Hmmmm. That's it?

Kid: Yup.

Define the Problem: 

Therapist: O.K. So you really like that class and my concern is that I need to do my job by meeting with you and I want you to stay safe.

Invitation:

Do you have any ideas about how we could work this out?

Kid: Well, you could get me during math. Except you should check 'cause sometimes we do some experiemnts in there that I don't want to miss.

Therapist: O.K. So, you'd like me to pull you during math and to check first to see if there is anything really impiortant going on that you don't want to miss?

Kid: Yeah.

Therapist: Well, that time, math, would work for me. The only problem I see is that if the time did not work for you, if you decided against going with me at that time, I might not be able to reschedule you for later in the day or later in the week. What if we were not able to reschedule for the week? Do you think that would be OK with you?

Kid: I guess, yeah.

Therapist: OK, lets give that a try next week. We can check back in and see how it's working.


Content note: References to families, teens, or kids are composites with changed details for illustration and do not represent any one child or family. 

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

TCC Newsletter Featuring CPS Groups

Below is a link to the Spring 2011 Newsletter from The Child Center with a feature story about Collaborative Problem Solving Parent Groups! Take a peek! There is information in the article about upcoming groups as well...

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

The 533 of Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS Cliff Notes)

The 5-3-3 of CPS: A Summary
Collaborative Problem-Solving (CPS) involves looking at explosive children with a different philosophy. CPS describes explosive children as having Learning Disabilities in 5 different pathways which are needed to adaptively solve problems and make decisions in their lives. Just as a child with a Learning Disability in reading is not making a choice not to read, a child with a LD in one of the 5 Pathways described below is not choosing to misbehave, have explosions, become destructive or aggressive, and continually behave in a way that prompts adults to behave in a way that creates more misery for the child. In other words, kids do well if they can. This is different than the common wisdom that “kids do well if they want to” which prescribes interventions focused on getting the child to “want to” do better (rewards and punishments). CPS teaches that explosive children are typically living a miserable and unhappy existence and do not lack the motivation to better. Rather, these children lack the skills to do better in their environment. Punishment and reward, without the development of the necessary skills to do better, are ineffective and create further frustrations for the child.

5 Pathways:
  1. Executive Functioning Skills: Problems with organization and planning, shifting activities or thoughts, Anticipating problems
  2. Language Processing Skills: Receptive or Expressive language difficulties cripple problem-solving because thinking and communicating both require language.
  3. Emotional Regulation Skills: Chronic irritability or other negative feelings impair the ability to control and modulate emotions even before a child is frustrated.
  4. Cognitive Flexibility Skills: Black and white, rigid, all-or-nothing, rule-bound, literal/concrete thinking gets in the way of seeing the grey in problem situations or social situations.
  5. Social Skills: Cognitive distortions/thinking errors, or deficits in skills needed to perceive the social environment and engage with others make relationships and social situations difficult.
3 Plans: (To work with behaviors and expectations)
  1. Plan A: Ask yourself: “Is the behavior important or undesirable enough to induce and endure a meltdown?”
    1. Increases the likelihood of explosive episodes through the imposition of adult will. Does not teach lagging skills. Does address adult concern/expectation.
    2. Reserved for very undesirable behaviors or safety concerns.
    3. Plan A behaviors should be behaviors that your child is able to meet on a fairly consistent basis.
    4. Plan A behaviors are behaviors which you are able to enforce.

  2. Plan C: Pick your battles! Low priority items which can be dealt with later on.
    1. Decreases the likelihood of explosive episodes by removing frustrations and modifying the environment so the child’s ability to cope is not outstripped by the demands of situations. Does not teach lagging skills. Does not address adult concern/expectation.
    2. Expectations which you have decided not to enforce or ignore for the time being. Can come back to it later.

  3. Plan B: Expectations which are important to meet. Adult serves a “surrogate frontal lobe” for child.
    1. Decreases the likelihood of explosive episodes by taking the child’s concerns into consideration and involving them in the solution. Teaches skills which will help the child deal with inflexibility and frustration in the future. Addresses adult concern/expectation as well as the child’s concern.
    2. Proactive Plan B is a planned conversation during a calm time. Emergency Plan B happens at the beginning stages of a meltdown and may help to avert the crisis. Proactive Plan B is easier and more effective because nobody is on the verge of crisis.
3 Steps of Plan B

Prethinking Plan B: Remember that you do not know where the plane is going to land when it takes off…
  1. Empathy plus Reassurance: Reflective listening or “I hear you” followed by reassurance that your are not using Plan A.
  2. Define the Problem: A problem is two concerns that have yet to be reconciled. Get the child’s concern first, then put yours on the table. Keep working until you have concerns rather than solutions.
  3. Invitation: Invite the child to solve the problem with you. “How could we work this out? Do you have any ideas?”
    -A solution should: Be doable by both parties, realistic, and mutually satisfactory.
This summary is based on: The Explosive Child by Ross W. Greene and training by J. Stuart Ablon. It is written for the Living Better with Challenging Children presentation series by it’s presenters, Mark Beach, Corey Jackson, and Rick Chamberlain who can be reached at 541.726.1465 or through http://groups.yahoo.com/group/collaborativeproblemsolving/